Talk:Solver Statistics
From Sokoban Wiki
Current revision as of 19:12, 26 February 2007
In the links where they take you to the level set's summary page, what do you think the proper format should be?
Right now, it's mostly:
Solver Statistics - <level set author> | <level set name>
when we know who the author is. Otherwise, I left the <level set author> to be the level set name.
Do you think the link format should be changd to this?
Solver Statistics - <level set name> | <level set name>
I think the name of the author should be there anywhere. Maybe it's a good idea to add the name in the table:
Collection name, Author, Levels, BoxSearch, Takaken, YASS ?
Solido has used the "tip" template to display the results compacter.
Here it is:
| XSokoban Statistics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BoxSearch | Takaken | YASS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| failed on these levels where at least one solver solved | count: 36 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 23 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37, 39 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 48 , 57 , 61 , 71 , 72 , 73, 74 , 76 , 85 , 87 , 89 , 90 | count: 0 | count: 51 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 48 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 67 , 68 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 76 , 79 , 85 , 87 , 89 , 90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| solved these levels where all other solvers failed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| failed on these levels where all other solvers solved | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| total solved | 42 | 78 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| total failed | 48 | 12 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think it's a good idea, isn't it ?
Matthias
I think it's a good idea that we add a column for "author". I added this column to the table.
Discussion topic:
Do you think we should name all of the summary pages (and links) without the level set's name ?
I think it's better not to use the author's name. For example, for the Sven collection, we have:
Solver Statistics - Sven Egevad
This is ok if we have only one set from this author. For authors (i.e. David W Skinner) with multiple level sets, this won't work. As a work around now, I appended a number after the author's name.
I think we should really change this to use the level set name instead of the author's name. Furthermore, we are really referring to the results of using a particular level set.
So, I think a link should be like this: (again using Sven as an example)
Solver Statistics - Sven level set
And for David W Skinner, we have these:
Solver Statistics - Microban level set Solver Statistics - Mas Microban level set Solver Statistics - Sasquatch level set
instead of:
Solver Statistics - David W Skinner Solver Statistics - David W Skinner 2 Solver Statistics - David W Skinner 3
This will make it easier to create the link with a logical/reasonable format and won't have any collision. Please let me know if you like this idea or not.
You are right. It doesn't make sense to use names like "David W Skinner 3" ...
We should use the set name instead. The new author column shows the author name - that's enough.
Matthias
